Showing: 11 - 13 of 13 RESULTS
Developing and Validating a Respectful Workplace Climate Scale with Construction Workers as Exemplar: A Total Worker Health Approach (Phase I)

Developing and Validating a Respectful Workplace Climate Scale with Construction Workers as Exemplar: A Total Worker Health Approach (Phase I)

Our project aims to develop and validate a Respectful Workplace Climate Scale to support the goal of fostering, promoting, and measuring a respectful workplace culture and climate in the workplace. In order to develop a reliable and valid respectful climate scale, we will utilize a mixed methods approach with both qualitative and quantitative methods. The current study represents Phase I of the project, providing insight on this topic based on the literature review and analysis of 10 SME?s responses. The long-term goal of this project is to help companies build a respectful workplace by developing a psychometrically sound Respectful Workplace Climate Scale that they can use to gauge the status of respect in their workplaces and the progress of interventions implemented.

Development and Initial Evaluation of a New Measure of Supervisor Social Support

Development and Initial Evaluation of a New Measure of Supervisor Social Support

The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure of supervisor social support with strong psychometric properties. Data were collected and analyzed from 258 employed students attending an American university. The scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability and showed evidence of both convergent and criterion-related validity. Ultimately, the scale may assist researchers in accumulating and classifying empirical findings to advance the field.

Single-item Measures: The orphaned nephew, living in the cupboard under the stairs, of measurement

Single-item Measures: The orphaned nephew, living in the cupboard under the stairs, of measurement

The knee-jerk reaction that all single-item measures in some respect imply a weak research design is counterproductive, and serves to limit advancements in the organizational sciences. Beyond providing an off-the-shelf compendium of single-item measures for scholars and practitioners we demonstrate that 82% (75 of the 91) single-item measures under consideration in our program of research demonstrated very good or extensive validity, evidencing moderate to high content validity, no usability concerns, moderate to high test-retest reliability, and extensive criterion validity.